Article 31C: Constitution of India 

Article 31C: Constitution of India 

Previous

Click for Index

Next

Article 31C: Saving of Laws Giving Effect to Certain Directive Principles

⚖️ Bare Act Text

Notwithstanding anything contained in article 13, no law giving effect to the policy of the State towards securing all or any of the principles laid down in Part IV shall be deemed to be void on the ground that it is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by article 14 or article 19; and no law containing a declaration that it is for giving effect to such policy shall be called in question in any court on the ground that it does not give effect to such policy:

Provided that where such law is made by the Legislature of a State, the provisions of this article shall not apply thereto unless such law, having been reserved for the consideration of the President, has received his assent.

📜 Footnotes

1. Article 31C was inserted by the 25th Constitutional Amendment Act.
2. Originally applied only to laws implementing Article 39(b) and (c) (distribution of resources and prevention of concentration of wealth).
3. The 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976 expanded it to cover all Directive Principles (Part IV).
4. This expansion was struck down in Minerva Mills v. Union of India, restoring its limited scope.
5. Provides immunity from challenge under Articles 14 and 19, subject to judicial review.

🧾 Simple Explanation

Article 31C protects certain laws that aim to implement Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSPs).

It means:

• Such laws cannot be challenged for violating equality (Article 14) or freedoms (Article 19)
• But only if they truly aim to implement specific DPSPs

Currently, it applies mainly to:

• Laws related to equitable distribution of resources
• Prevention of wealth concentration

📌 Key Features

• Overrides Articles 14 and 19 (in limited cases)
• Supports implementation of Directive Principles
• Reflects priority of social welfare over individual rights
• Subject to judicial review
• Requires Presidential assent for State laws

⚖️ Important Case Laws

1. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala

• Upheld Article 31C partially
• Introduced Basic Structure Doctrine

2. Minerva Mills v. Union of India

• Struck down expansion of Article 31C
• Restored balance between Fundamental Rights and DPSPs

3. Sanjeev Coke Manufacturing Co. v. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd.

• Upheld laws under Article 39(b) and (c)

🧠 Illustrations

• Law distributing land to reduce inequality → ✔️ Protected
• Law preventing monopoly of resources → ✔️ Valid
• Law violating equality without DPSP connection → ❌ Not protected
• Blanket protection to all DPSPs → ❌ Not allowed after Minerva Mills

📚 Practical Notes

• Key concept: FR vs DPSP balance
• Article 31C gives limited primacy to DPSPs
• Must be read with Articles 31A and 31B
• Central to constitutional philosophy questions
• Frequently asked in UPSC, Judiciary exams

❓ FAQs

Q. Does Article 31C override Fundamental Rights?
✔️ Yes, but only Articles 14 and 19 and in limited cases

Q. Does it apply to all Directive Principles?
❌ No — only Article 39(b) and (c) (after Minerva Mills)

Q. Can courts review such laws?
✔️ Yes — judicial review still applies

Q. Why was Article 31C introduced?
To prioritize social and economic justice

💬 Comments / Legal Insight

Article 31C represents the constitutional attempt to balance:

• Individual rights (Fundamental Rights)
• With collective welfare (Directive Principles)

The Supreme Court of India has ensured that:

• Neither Part III nor Part IV dominates completely

This balance forms part of the basic structure of the Constitution, making Article 31C a key provision in understanding India’s constitutional philosophy.

Article 31C: Constitution of India 

Previous

Click for Index

Next