Article 27: Constitution of India

Article 27: Constitution of India 

Previous

Click for Index

Next

🔷 Article 27: Freedom as to Payment of Taxes for Promotion of any Particular Religion

⚖️ Bare Act Text

“No person shall be compelled to pay any taxes, the proceeds of which are specifically appropriated in payment of expenses for the promotion or maintenance of any particular religion or religious denomination.”

📜 Footnotes

1. Article 27 embodies the principle of secularism, ensuring that the State does not promote any particular religion through taxation.
2. It prohibits compulsory taxation specifically meant for religious promotion, but does not prohibit general taxes used for secular purposes that may incidentally benefit religious institutions.
3. The State can incur expenditure for administrative regulation of religious institutions without violating Article 27.

🧾 Simple Explanation

Article 27 means:

• The government cannot force people to pay taxes for promoting a specific religion
• Public money must not be used to favor one religion over others

However:

• General taxes (like income tax, GST) are valid
• Government spending on maintenance, security, or administration of religious places is allowed if secular in nature

📌 Key Features

• Protects individuals from religious taxation
• Ensures State neutrality in religion
• Applies to all persons
• Allows secular use of public funds, even if indirectly related to religion
• Strengthens India’s secular framework

⚖️ Important Case Laws

1. Commissioner, Hindu Religious Endowments v. Sri Lakshmindra Thirtha Swamiar of Shirur Mutt

• Distinguished between tax and fee
• Held that fees for regulation are valid

2. Jagannath Ramanuj Das v. State of Orissa

• Upheld regulatory measures over religious institutions

3. Prafull Goradia v. Union of India

• Clarified that indirect or incidental benefits to religion do not violate Article 27

🧠 Illustrations

• Tax collected specifically to promote one religion → ❌ Violation
• Government funding for temple administration (secular purpose) → ✔️ Valid
• Public funds used for maintenance of all religious sites equally → ✔️ Valid
• Mandatory religious donation imposed by State → ❌ Violation

📚 Practical Notes

• Key distinction: Tax vs Fee
• Article 27 does not prohibit all State interaction with religion
• Focus is on compulsion and specific appropriation
• Important in debates on State funding of religious activities
• Frequently asked in constitutional law exams

❓ FAQs

Q. Does Article 27 ban all government spending on religion?
❌ No — only spending from taxes specifically meant to promote a religion

Q. Are fees for temple or religious regulation valid?
✔️ Yes — if for administrative purposes

Q. Can government fund pilgrimage schemes?
✔️ Sometimes allowed if not discriminatory or exclusively religious taxation

Q. Does it apply to all persons?
✔️ Yes

💬 Comments / Legal Insight

Article 27 reinforces the idea that the State must remain neutral in religious matters.
It prevents misuse of public funds for religious favoritism, while still allowing the State to:

• Regulate institutions
• Maintain public order
• Ensure equal treatment

The interpretation by the Supreme Court of India has clarified that complete separation is not required, but non-preferential treatment is essential.

Article 27: Constitution of India 

Previous

Click for Index

Next