Article 32A: Constitution of India 

Article 32A: Constitution of India 

Previous

Click for Index

Next

Article 32A: Constitutional Validity of State Laws Not to be Considered in Proceedings under Article 32

⚖️ Bare Act Text

[Omitted by the Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Act, 1977.]

📜 Footnotes

1. Article 32A was inserted by the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act.
2. It barred the Supreme Court of India from considering the constitutional validity of State laws in proceedings under Article 32.
3. It was omitted by the 43rd Constitutional Amendment Act.
4. The provision was seen as a restriction on the power of judicial review.

🧾 Simple Explanation

Article 32A earlier meant:

• While enforcing Fundamental Rights under Article 32, the Supreme Court could not examine whether a State law was unconstitutional

This significantly:

• Limited the Court’s power
• Reduced effectiveness of Article 32

It was later removed to restore full judicial review powers.

📌 Key Features (Before Omission)

• Restricted Supreme Court jurisdiction under Article 32
• Prevented challenge to State laws in FR petitions
• Considered a limitation on judicial review
• Part of broader Emergency-era constitutional changes

⚖️ Important Case Laws

• No major enduring case law due to its short lifespan, but its removal is closely linked to restoration of judicial review principles affirmed in cases like Minerva Mills v. Union of India.

🧠 Illustrations

• Citizen challenges State law under Article 32 → ❌ Not allowed (during existence of 32A)
• Supreme Court unable to strike down State law → ❌ Limitation
• After repeal → ✔️ Full power restored

📚 Practical Notes

• Article 32A is no longer in force
• Important for understanding limitations on judicial review during Emergency
• Shows how constitutional amendments can alter balance of power
• Frequently asked in constitutional history and amendment questions

❓ FAQs

Q. Is Article 32A currently applicable?
❌ No — it was repealed in 1977

Q. What was its main effect?
Restricted Supreme Court’s power under Article 32

Q. Why was it removed?
To restore judicial review and constitutional balance

Q. Did it affect Fundamental Rights?
✔️ Yes — it limited their enforceability

💬 Comments / Legal Insight

Article 32A is an example of how constitutional mechanisms can be temporarily altered during political phases like the Emergency.

Its removal reaffirmed:

• The importance of judicial review
• The central role of Article 32 in protecting rights

The experience highlights that:
👉 Independent judiciary is essential for safeguarding Fundamental Rights

Article 32A: Constitution of India 

Previous

Click for Index

Next